Welcome! Log In Create A New Profile


question about adding checksumming into ext2

Posted by yangsuli 
question about adding checksumming into ext2
July 26, 2010 04:42PM
Hell, everyone,

I am trying to modify the ext2 file system to include checksuming on a
per block basis. That is, for each pointer in the file system, I would
like to add one field to store the checksum. When writing a block, the
fs will compute the checksum for that block of data and store it in
the appropriate place; when reading a block, the fs will also compute
the checksum and compare it to the checksum previously stored, if
there’s a mismatch, fs reports an error.

I am not quite sure what I should do here…. So I am wondering if
anyone could give me a hand, or direct me to some resources which
might be helpful?

Basically what I have done is adding fields in inode and indirect
block to include checksum. (Now I put them immediately after the
pointer, and each of the checksum occupies the space of a __le32.
That’s probably not the best design because it would be very difficult
if I want to change the size of the checksum; but what’s done is
done…) For this purpose I also changed the way the ext2 file system
goes through the pointers in the file metadata ( to be more specific,
the ext2_get_branch, ext2_alloc_branch, ext2_splice_branch,
ext2_getblocks functions, etc..) For this part, I have already
compiled the code and done some basic tests. It seems running OK.

So what need to do now is to modify the read/write function of ext2,
so that when read in /write out a block of data, it also does the
checksuming stuff.

So my question is: where should I make the modification????

From my understanding I think I have two choices (plz correct me if I
am wrong): one is to do checksuming when we are reading from/writing
to the page cache. That is, to modify something like file->f_op-
>aio_read/aio_write, or address_space->a_ops->write_end. The benefit
of doing this is that it would be easier to get the block numbers
(relative to the beginning of the file) from the range of file which
needs to be read/written , and thus which checksum to modify (It’s not
that simple, though….). The drawback, however, is that we have to
compute the checksum each time we access page cache, which would be a
significant cost. Also, there are a lot of places where we change page
cache…e.g, regular file read/write, nobh write, file mapping…. etc. It
would be quite difficult to locate all those places and it may not be
good practice

The other possibility is to modify the process when we read data from
the disk / commit write to the disk. The advantage of doing this is
obvious; however, there are still some problems: 1. The code which
actually access the disk may be everywhere, too. From reading the code
I learned that both generic_file_aio_write and background threads
which are responsible for flushing dirty pages into disk eventually
called ext2_writepage ( ext2_writepages will call __mpage_writepage,
which will then call ext2_writepage in case of an ext2 file, right?).
However, for many other cases.say nobh writing, file mapping, direct I/
0, do they all eventually call ext2_writepage or not? I guess I still
need to find out. 2. Functions which deal with reading/writing data
from/ino disk are such low level so that their argument is something
like bio instead of file position and range; and it’s not
straightforward in concept to get the position where we are reading/
writing the file from the bio. 3. Some file operation (say,
simple_fsync, which is called by ext2_fsync), actually called
ll_rw_block, and bypassed the ext2 writepage(s) functions. What should
I do in this case?

Thank you very much for your attention and help 

p.s I noticed that the generic_file_sync function first called
filemap_wrte_and_wait_range() to sync a file, then again it called
sync_mapping_buffers to sync a file, and again it called sync_inode()
to sync the very same file. Is there a particular reason for such a
redundancy? Thank you.

Your Email:


Spam prevention:
Please, solve the mathematical question and enter the answer in the input field below. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically.
Question: how much is 19 plus 12?